ETF comparison
GLTR vs IAU
Commodities vs Gold.
abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF · iShares Gold Trust
Holdings overlap
Holdings overlap isn't available for GLTR or IAU.
Some fund types (grantor trusts, unit trusts) don't publish holdings in the standard monthly form we use. The side-by-side stats, sub-score comparison, and cost-difference panel below are still directly comparable.
Side by side
Sub-score comparison
Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.
Cost difference
IAU is 35 bps cheaper than GLTR. On a $100,000 position that's about $350/yr more in fees for GLTR.
Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with GLTR vs IAU.
Related comparisons
More comparisons with GLTR
More comparisons with IAU
- IAU vs PDBC · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF 0.0%
- IAU vs SGOL · abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF 0.0%
- IAU vs SIVR · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF 0.0%
- IAU vs SLV · iShares Silver Trust 0.0%
- IAU vs COMT · iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF 0.0%
- IAU vs DBA · Invesco DB Agriculture Fund 0.0%
Percentages are holdings overlap with the named fund.
Open GLTR or IAU at a brokerage
Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.
Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.
Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions
matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see
/methodology/.
Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.