PlainIndex

ETF comparison

GLD vs GLTR

Gold vs Commodities.

SPDR Gold Shares · abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of GLD and GLTR would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

GLD only 0.0% Shared 0.0% GLTR only 0.0%
In GLD only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In GLTR only
0 positions

Holdings data for GLD covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for GLTR covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

GLD

SPDR Gold Shares

State Street · Gold

73 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.40%
Net assets
$153.51B
TTM yield
0.00%
Top-10 conc.
—
GLTR

abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

abrdn · Commodities

59 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.60%
Net assets
$2.92B
TTM yield
0.00%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

60
Cost
40
66
Tax efficiency
73
100
Liquidity
77
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
GLD sub-score GLTR

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

GLD is 20 bps cheaper than GLTR. On a $100,000 position that's about $200/yr more in fees for GLTR.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in GLD

0 total

Every GLD position is also held by GLTR.

Only in GLTR

0 total

Every GLTR position is also held by GLD.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.