PlainIndex

ETF comparison

DFLV vs IJH

US Value vs US Mid Cap.

Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF · iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of DFLV and IJH would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

DFLV only 0.0% Shared 0.0% IJH only 0.0%
In DFLV only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In IJH only
0 positions

Holdings data for DFLV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for IJH covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

DFLV

Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

Dimensional · US Value

84 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.21%
Net assets
$5.89B
TTM yield
1.46%
Top-10 conc.
—
IJH

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF

iShares · US Mid Cap

94 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.050%
Net assets
$115.69B
TTM yield
1.22%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

79
Cost
95
85
Tax efficiency
86
90
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
DFLV sub-score IJH

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

IJH is 16 bps cheaper than DFLV. On a $100,000 position that's about $160/yr more in fees for DFLV.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in DFLV

0 total

Every DFLV position is also held by IJH.

Only in IJH

0 total

Every IJH position is also held by DFLV.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.