PlainIndex

ETF comparison

IYJ vs XLI

Both Industrials.

iShares U.S. Industrials ETF · State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IYJ and XLI would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IYJ only 0.0% Shared 0.0% XLI only 0.0%
In IYJ only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In XLI only
0 positions

Holdings data for IYJ covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for XLI covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

IYJ

iShares U.S. Industrials ETF

iShares · Industrials

69 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.38%
Net assets
$1.99B
TTM yield
0.77%
Top-10 conc.
—
XLI

State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF

State Street · Industrials

92 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.080%
Net assets
$30.09B
TTM yield
1.17%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

62
Cost
92
83
Tax efficiency
81
70
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
IYJ sub-score XLI

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

XLI is 30 bps cheaper than IYJ. On a $100,000 position that's about $300/yr more in fees for IYJ.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in IYJ

0 total

Every IYJ position is also held by XLI.

Only in XLI

0 total

Every XLI position is also held by IYJ.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.