PlainIndex

ETF comparison

LTPZ vs STIP

Both TIPS.

PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index Exchange-Traded Fund · iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of LTPZ and STIP would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

LTPZ only 0.0% Shared 0.0% STIP only 0.0%
In LTPZ only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In STIP only
0 positions

Holdings data for LTPZ covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for STIP covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

LTPZ

PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index Exchange-Traded Fund

PIMCO · TIPS

62 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.20%
Net assets
$685.0M
TTM yield
3.77%
Top-10 conc.
—
STIP

iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF

iShares · TIPS

86 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.030%
Net assets
$14.99B
TTM yield
3.40%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

80
Cost
97
44
Tax efficiency
45
49
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
LTPZ sub-score STIP

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

STIP is 17 bps cheaper than LTPZ. On a $100,000 position that's about $170/yr more in fees for LTPZ.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in LTPZ

0 total

Every LTPZ position is also held by STIP.

Only in STIP

0 total

Every STIP position is also held by LTPZ.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.