ETF comparison
MTUMvsQQQ
Momentum Factor vs US Large Cap Growth.
Holdings overlap
30 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of MTUM and QQQ would leave roughly42.5%of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.
Side by side
Sub-score comparison
Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — seewhat we don't scorefor why.
Cost difference
MTUM is 3 bps cheaper than QQQ. On a $100,000 position that's about $30/yr more in fees for QQQ.
Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open thecost calculator pre-filled with MTUM vs QQQ.
Top shared holdings
30 shared in total| # | Holding | In MTUM | In QQQ | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 5.56% | 5.64% | 5.56% |
| 2 | NVIDIA CORPORATION | 4.64% | 7.60% | 4.64% |
| 3 | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 4.03% | 4.10% | 4.03% |
| 4 | INTEL CORPORATION | 3.83% | 3.04% | 3.04% |
| 5 | ALPHABET INC. | 2.94% | 3.27% | 2.94% |
| 6 | BROADCOM INC. | 5.40% | 2.81% | 2.81% |
| 7 | WALMART INC. | 2.75% | 2.39% | 2.39% |
| 8 | ALPHABET INC. | 2.39% | 3.02% | 2.39% |
| 9 | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. | 2.36% | 2.49% | 2.36% |
| 10 | LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION | 3.61% | 2.35% | 2.35% |
| 11 | KLA CORPORATION | 1.61% | 1.71% | 1.61% |
| 12 | PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. | 1.52% | 1.16% | 1.16% |
Only in MTUM
95 total- JOHNSON & JOHNSON3.76%
- EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION3.43%
- CATERPILLAR INC.3.21%
- JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.2.87%
- GE VERNOVA INC.2.53%
- GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY1.90%
- THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.1.69%
- AMPHENOL CORPORATION1.55%
- RTX CORPORATION1.46%
- MORGAN STANLEY1.32%
Only in QQQ
72 total- Apple Inc.6.67%
- Microsoft Corp.4.35%
- Amazon.com, Inc.4.02%
- Tesla, Inc.3.30%
- Meta Platforms, Inc.2.62%
- Cisco Systems, Inc.2.01%
- Costco Wholesale Corp.1.80%
- Sandisk Corp.1.46%
- Netflix, Inc.1.30%
- Palo Alto Networks, Inc.1.21%
Open MTUM or QQQ at a brokerage
Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.
Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodologyand funding disclosure.
Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see/methodology/.
Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.