PlainIndex

ETF comparison

NEAR vs PULS

Both US Aggregate Bond.

iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF · PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of NEAR and PULS would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

NEAR only 0.0% Shared 0.0% PULS only 0.0%
In NEAR only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In PULS only
0 positions

Holdings data for NEAR covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for PULS covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

NEAR

iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF

iShares · US Aggregate Bond

70 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.25%
Net assets
$4.33B
TTM yield
4.48%
Top-10 conc.
—
PULS

PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF

PGIM · US Aggregate Bond

79 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.15%
Net assets
$15.70B
TTM yield
5.02%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

75
Cost
85
44
Tax efficiency
42
84
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
NEAR sub-score PULS

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

PULS is 10 bps cheaper than NEAR. On a $100,000 position that's about $100/yr more in fees for NEAR.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in NEAR

0 total

Every NEAR position is also held by PULS.

Only in PULS

0 total

Every PULS position is also held by NEAR.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.