Skip to main content

ETF comparison

NOBL vs VO

Dividend vs US Mid Cap.

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF · Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF

Holdings overlap

Weighted by ISIN/CUSIP
9.2 %

26 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of NOBL and VO would leave roughly 9.2% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

NOBL unmatched 90.7% Shared 9.2% VO unmatched 90.5%

Unmatched is the part of a fund's weight the other fund doesn't match: names only it holds, plus any extra weight it puts in names both funds hold.

In NOBL only
44 positions
Shared
26 positions
In VO only
256 positions

Side by side

NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

ProShares · Dividend

80 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.35%
Net assets
$10.95B
TTM yield
2.01%
Top-10 conc.
16.5%
VO

Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF

Vanguard · US Mid Cap

96 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.030%
Net assets
$216.43B
whole fund, 5 share classes
TTM yield
1.00%
Top-10 conc.
9.5%

Sub-score comparison

65
Cost
97
76
Tax efficiency
88
100
Liquidity
100
91
Concentration
100
—
Tracking quality
—
NOBL sub-score VO

Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.

Cost difference

VO is 32 bps cheaper than NOBL. On a $100,000 position that's about $320/yr more in fees for NOBL.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with NOBL vs VO.

Top shared holdings

26 shared in total
# Holding In NOBL In VO Overlap
1 WW Grainger, Inc. 1.54% 0.59% 0.59%
2 Target Corp. 1.41% 0.57% 0.57%
3 Realty Income Corp. 1.40% 0.56% 0.56%
4 Cardinal Health, Inc. 1.41% 0.54% 0.54%
5 Fastenal Co. 1.42% 0.53% 0.53%
6 Aflac, Inc. 1.42% 0.52% 0.52%
7 Nucor Corp. 1.76% 0.49% 0.49%
8 Becton Dickinson & Co. 1.38% 0.40% 0.40%
9 Consolidated Edison, Inc. 1.43% 0.39% 0.39%
10 Sysco Corp. 1.49% 0.39% 0.39%
11 Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. 1.67% 0.36% 0.36%
12 Kenvue, Inc. 1.46% 0.35% 0.35%

Only in NOBL

44 total
  • International Business Machines Corp. 1.71%
  • Franklin Resources, Inc. 1.67%
  • Colgate-Palmolive Co. 1.61%
  • Caterpillar, Inc. 1.60%
  • Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 1.60%
  • Hormel Foods Corp. 1.60%
  • JM Smucker Co. (The) 1.58%
  • Essex Property Trust, Inc. 1.58%
  • Federal Realty Investment Trust 1.58%
  • General Dynamics Corp. 1.56%

Only in VO

256 total
  • Vertiv Holdings Co 1.22%
  • Western Digital Corp 1.06%
  • Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05%
  • Quanta Services Inc 1.04%
  • Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04%
  • Cummins Inc 0.95%
  • Datadog Inc 0.83%
  • Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%
  • Constellation Energy Corp 0.78%
  • Robinhood Markets Inc 0.77%

Percentages are holdings overlap with the named fund.

Open NOBL or VO at a brokerage

Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.