ETF comparison

PZAvsSCMB

Both US Municipal Bond.

Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF · Schwab Municipal Bond ETF

Holdings overlap

Weighted by ISIN/CUSIP
24.8%

2,372 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of PZA and SCMB would leave roughly24.8%of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

PZA only 71.0%Shared 24.8%SCMB only 74.2%
In PZA only
4,292 positions
Shared
2,372 positions
In SCMB only
4,473 positions

Side by side

PZA

Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF

Invesco · US Municipal Bond

83composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.28%
Net assets
$4.24B
TTM yield
3.94%
Top-10 conc.
1.0%
SCMB

Schwab Municipal Bond ETF

Schwab · US Municipal Bond

93composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.030%
Net assets
$4.18B
TTM yield
3.67%
Top-10 conc.
1.9%

Sub-score comparison

72
Cost
97
93
Tax efficiency
93
84
Liquidity
84
100
Concentration
100
Tracking quality
PZAsub-scoreSCMB

Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — seewhat we don't scorefor why.

Cost difference

SCMB is 25 bps cheaper than PZA. On a $100,000 position that's about $250/yr more in fees for PZA.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open thecost calculator pre-filled with PZA vs SCMB.

Top shared holdings

2,372 shared in total
#HoldingIn PZAIn SCMBOverlap
1New York (State of) Dormitory Authority0.12%0.08%0.08%
2New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority0.09%0.08%0.08%
3Jefferson (County of), AL0.09%0.08%0.08%
4Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District0.07%0.13%0.07%
5Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District0.10%0.07%0.07%
6Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority (Green Bonds)0.07%0.09%0.07%
7New York (City of), NY Transitional Finance Authority0.07%0.07%0.07%
8Texas Water Development Board0.07%0.08%0.07%
9Chicago (City of), IL Transit Authority0.07%0.14%0.07%
10Oklahoma (State of) Turnpike Authority (Senior Bonds)0.07%0.08%0.07%
11New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority0.08%0.06%0.06%
12Massachusetts (Commonwealth of)0.06%0.14%0.06%

Only in PZA

4,292 total
  • California (State of) Health Facilities Financing Authority (Kaiser Permanente)0.13%
  • Regents of the University of California Medical Center0.10%
  • Regents of the University of California Medical Center0.10%
  • Orange (County of), FL Health Facilities Authority (Orlando Health Obligated Group)0.10%
  • California (State of) Health Facilities Financing Authority (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center)0.09%
  • Lower Alabama Gas District (The)0.09%
  • Colorado (State of) Health Facilities Authority (CommonSpirit Health)0.08%
  • Northwest Independent School District0.08%
  • Hays Consolidated Independent School District0.08%
  • New Jersey (State of) Economic Development Authority (Portal North Bridge)0.08%

Only in SCMB

4,473 total
  • Commonwealth of Massachusetts0.22%
  • Gwinnett County School District0.22%
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania0.21%
  • City of New York NY0.20%
  • State of California Department of Water Resources0.19%
  • State of Washington0.17%
  • New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority0.17%
  • Indiana Finance Authority0.15%
  • City of New York NY0.15%
  • Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District0.15%

Open PZA or SCMB at a brokerage

Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodologyand funding disclosure.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see/methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.