PlainIndex

ETF comparison

SCHO vs SCHP

US Treasury (Short) vs TIPS.

Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF · Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of SCHO and SCHP would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

SCHO only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SCHP only 0.0%
In SCHO only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SCHP only
0 positions

Holdings data for SCHO covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SCHP covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

SCHO

Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF

Schwab · US Treasury (Short)

87 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.030%
Net assets
$12.49B
TTM yield
3.97%
Top-10 conc.
—
SCHP

Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF

Schwab · TIPS

85 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.030%
Net assets
$15.46B
TTM yield
3.68%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

97
Cost
97
51
Tax efficiency
44
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
SCHO sub-score SCHP

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

Expense ratios are effectively identical (0.030% vs 0.030%).

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in SCHO

0 total

Every SCHO position is also held by SCHP.

Only in SCHP

0 total

Every SCHP position is also held by SCHO.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.