Skip to main content

ETF comparison

GBIL vs SHV

Both US Treasury (Short).

Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF · iShares 0–1 Year Treasury Bond ETF

Holdings overlap

Weighted by ISIN/CUSIP
35.7 %

32 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of GBIL and SHV would leave roughly 35.7% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

GBIL unmatched 64.0% Shared 35.7% SHV unmatched 67.5%

Unmatched is the part of a fund's weight the other fund doesn't match: names only it holds, plus any extra weight it puts in names both funds hold.

In GBIL only
11 positions
Shared
32 positions
In SHV only
31 positions

Side by side

GBIL

Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

Goldman Sachs · US Treasury (Short)

83 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.12%
Net assets
$7.92B
TTM yield
3.60%
Top-10 conc.
52.4%
SHV

iShares 0–1 Year Treasury Bond ETF

iShares · US Treasury (Short)

83 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.15%
Net assets
$22.83B
TTM yield
3.63%
Top-10 conc.
39.3%

Sub-score comparison

88
Cost
85
58
Tax efficiency
58
96
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
GBIL sub-score SHV

Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.

Cost difference

GBIL is 3 bps cheaper than SHV. On a $100,000 position that's about $30/yr more in fees for SHV.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with GBIL vs SHV.

Top shared holdings

32 shared in total
# Holding In GBIL In SHV Overlap
1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.50% 4.42% 3.50%
2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.40% 4.95% 3.40%
3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 6.33% 3.16% 3.16%
4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.82% 4.49% 2.82%
5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.75% 2.72% 2.72%
6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 6.33% 2.14% 2.14%
7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.84% 1.75% 1.75%
8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 1.74% 1.40% 1.40%
9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 1.33% 4.10% 1.33%
10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 1.32% 2.64% 1.32%
11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 1.32% 3.01% 1.32%
12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.45% 1.21% 1.21%

Only in GBIL

11 total
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.67%
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.67%
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.33%
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.40%
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.19%
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.05%
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 1.52%
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 1.48%
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 1.00%
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 0.98%

Only in SHV

31 total
  • United States of America 4.23%
  • United States of America 3.74%
  • United States of America 3.34%
  • United States of America 3.30%
  • United States of America 3.12%
  • United States of America 2.87%
  • United States of America 2.45%
  • United States of America 2.43%
  • United States of America 2.27%
  • United States of America 2.13%

Percentages are holdings overlap with the named fund.

Open GBIL or SHV at a brokerage

Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.