PlainIndex

ETF comparison

IYG vs XLF

Both Financials.

iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF · State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IYG and XLF would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IYG only 0.0% Shared 0.0% XLF only 0.0%
In IYG only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In XLF only
0 positions

Holdings data for IYG covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for XLF covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

IYG

iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF

iShares · Financials

69 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.38%
Net assets
$2.01B
TTM yield
1.11%
Top-10 conc.
—
XLF

State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF

State Street · Financials

91 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.080%
Net assets
$51.46B
TTM yield
1.52%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

62
Cost
92
81
Tax efficiency
80
70
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
IYG sub-score XLF

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

XLF is 30 bps cheaper than IYG. On a $100,000 position that's about $300/yr more in fees for IYG.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in IYG

0 total

Every IYG position is also held by XLF.

Only in XLF

0 total

Every XLF position is also held by IYG.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.