PlainIndex

ETF comparison

IHF vs XBI

Both Healthcare.

iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IHF and XBI would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IHF only 0.0% Shared 0.0% XBI only 0.0%
In IHF only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In XBI only
0 positions

Holdings data for IHF covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for XBI covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

IHF

iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF

iShares · Healthcare

64 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.38%
Net assets
$776.6M
TTM yield
1.11%
Top-10 conc.
—
XBI

State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF

State Street · Healthcare

79 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.35%
Net assets
$8.30B
TTM yield
0.34%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

62
Cost
65
81
Tax efficiency
84
52
Liquidity
96
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
IHF sub-score XBI

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

XBI is 3 bps cheaper than IHF. On a $100,000 position that's about $30/yr more in fees for IHF.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in IHF

0 total

Every IHF position is also held by XBI.

Only in XBI

0 total

Every XBI position is also held by IHF.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.